4.6 Article

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound-guided sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage breast cancer: a prospective cohort study

期刊

WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
卷 21, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12957-023-03024-7

关键词

Sentinel lymph nodes (SLN); Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB); Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS); SonoVue; Microbubbles; Breast cancer

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated the identification efficiency of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in accurately representing the axillary node status in early-stage breast cancer. The results showed that CEUS can accurately depict the status of axillary lymph nodes.
ObjectiveThis study evaluated the identification efficiency of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) to accurately represent the axillary node status in early-stage breast cancer.Method In total, 109 consecutive consenting patients with clinically node-negative and T1-2 breast cancer were included in this study. All patients received CEUS to identify SLN before surgery, and a guidewire was deployed to locate SLN in those who were successfully explored by CEUS. The patients underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), and the blue dye was used to trace SLN during the surgery. The decision to perform axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) depended on the intraoperative pathological identification of SLN by CEUS (CE-SLN). The concordance rate of pathological status between CE-SLN and dyed SLN was calculated.Result The CEUS detection rate was 96.3%; CE-SLN failed in 4 patients. Among the remaining 105 successful identifications, 18 were CE-SLN positive by intraoperative frozen section, and one with CE-SLN micrometastasis was diagnosed by paraffin section. No additional lymph node metastases were found in CE-SLN-negative patients. The concordance rate of pathological status between CE-SLN and dyed SLN was 100%.Conclusion CEUS can accurately represent the status of axillary lymph nodes in patients with clinically node-negative and small tumor burden breast cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据