4.4 Review

Mutual Coupling Reduction Techniques for UWB-MIMO Antenna for Band Notch Characteristics: A Comprehensive Review

期刊

WIRELESS PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS
卷 131, 期 2, 页码 1207-1247

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11277-023-10477-2

关键词

Ultra-wideband (UWB); MIMO; EBG; Meta-material; Neutralization line

向作者/读者索取更多资源

With the rapid advancements in wireless communication systems, new applications such as IoT, machine-to-machine communication, vehicular communication, and video on demand require high data rates in short-range communication. Traditional antenna systems are not suitable for these applications. UWB-MIMO antennas have proven to be a suitable solution due to their improved capability and reliability in short-range communication. The main challenge in designing UWB-MIMO antennas is reducing the mutual coupling effects among multiple antennas. This paper presents and analyzes various techniques for mutual coupling reduction, including EBG structures, meta-materials, parasitic or slot, and stub structures, neutralization lines, etc.
With the rapid advancements in wireless communication systems, the applications that have emerged recently such as the Internet of Things (IoT), machine-to-machine communication, vehicular communication and video on demand, etc. require very high data rates in short-range communication for better reliability. Antenna systems utilized in traditional communications are not suitable for these applications. Ultra Wide Band (UWB)-Multiple Input Multiple Output (UWB-MIMO) antennas have proved to fit these requirements owing to their improved capability and reliability in short-range communication. The major challenge in designing the UWB-MIMO antennas is to reduce the mutual coupling effects among multiple antennas. In this paper, various techniques for mutual coupling reduction are presented and analyzed such as Electromagnetic band-gap (EBG) structures, meta-materials, parasitic or slot, and stub structures, neutralization lines, etc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据