4.4 Article

Extraction and determination of mercury from spring water, beverage and rice samples using combined microwave-assisted cloud point and dispersive-solid phase extraction in micellar media

期刊

WATER AND ENVIRONMENT JOURNAL
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/wej.12863

关键词

beverage; dispersion in micellar media; mercury; microwave assisted; rice samples; spring water

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The determination of inorganic mercury species in water, beverages and foods using a combination of microwave-assisted cloud point extraction and dispersive-solid phase extraction (MA-CP-dSPE) is presented. The method is based on the dispersion of nanoparticles in micellar media with a novel ligand and allows mercury determination from 0.020 to 350 mg/L. The accuracy of the procedure was confirmed using certified reference material, and the method successfully analyzed copper in spring water, beverage and rice samples.
The determination of inorganic mercury species in water, beverages and foods has been a special research priority in recent years because mercury, as a highly carcinogenic species, even in trace concentration, has high adverse effects on the body of living organisms. In this research, combining two extraction techniques, including microwave-assisted cloud point extraction and dispersive-solid phase extraction (MA-CP-dSPE), for the separation and pre-concentration of mercury in environmental samples is presented. This method is based on the dispersion of nanoparticles in micellar media in the presence of a novel mono-thiosemicarbazone Schiff base (2 N & PRIME;-[4-diphenylamino]benzylidene) hydrazinecarbothiohydrazide) ligand. Using the experimental conditions defined in the optimization, the method allowed mercury determination from 0.020 to 350 mg/L with a detection limit of 0.005 mg/L. The accuracy of the procedure was tested by analysing certified reference material. The method was successfully applied to copper determination in spring water, beverage and rice samples.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据