4.6 Article

Removal of Brilliant Yellow Azo Dye from Wastewater by Electrocoagulation in a Cell of Improved Design

期刊

WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION
卷 234, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER INT PUBL AG
DOI: 10.1007/s11270-023-06241-8

关键词

Brilliant yellow azo dye; Color removal; Electrochemical reactor design; Electrocoagulation; Helical coil; Wastewater treatment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Electrocoagulation using an Al helical coil cell was employed to remove brilliant yellow azo dye from wastewater. The coil's external surface served as the anode, while its internal surface acted as a cooler to control temperature. Several variables, including current density, dye concentration, pH, temperature, NaCl concentration, and stirring rate, were studied. Under optimal conditions, a maximum dye removal efficiency of 92% was achieved in 90 minutes, with an energy consumption ranging from 3.258 to 313.3 kW·h/kg.
Removal of brilliant yellow azo dye from wastewater by electrocoagulation was carried out using a cell with Al helical coil whose external surface acts as an anode, and its internal surface acts potentially as a cooler to control the cell temperature. This is important in the case of large-scale cells which use high currents and low electrolyte conductivity where accumulated heat decreases the rate of electrocoagulation. The helical coil anode was enclosed between two Al cylindrical screen cathodes. Variables studied were current density, initial dye concentration, solution pH, solution temperature, NaCl concentration, and magnetic stirring rate. Most of the variables were found to have opposing effects on the % dye removal. Under the optimum conditions, a maximum of 92% dye removal was obtained in 90 min using a current density of 3 mA/cm(2), pH 5-6, an initial dye concentration ranging from 10 to 75 ppm, and NaCl concentration of 30 g/L. Electrical energy consumption ranged from 3.258 to 313.3 kW center dot h/kg of dye removed depending on the operating conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据