4.3 Article

Tilt aftereffect spreads across the visual field

期刊

VISION RESEARCH
卷 205, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2022.108174

关键词

Orientation perception; Tilt aftereffect; Receptive field

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This research demonstrates that the tilt aftereffect (TAE) not only occurs at the location of the adapter, but also spreads to other locations in the visual field. Through experiments, the researchers found TAE magnitudes in all tested locations and built a computational model to explain the neural mechanisms underlying this spread.
The tilt aftereffect (TAE) is observed when adaptation to a tilted contour alters the perceived tilt of a subse-quently presented contour. Thus far, TAE has been treated as a local aftereffect observed only at the location of the adapter. Whether and how TAE spreads to other locations in the visual field has not been systematically studied. Here, we sought an answer to this question by measuring TAE magnitudes at locations including but not limited to the adapter location. The adapter was a tilted grating presented at the same peripheral location throughout an experimental session. In a single trial, participants indicated the perceived tilt of a test grating presented after the adapter at one of fifteen locations in the same visual hemifield as the adapter. We found non-zero TAE magnitudes in all locations tested, showing that the effect spreads across the tested visual hemifield. Next, to establish a link between neuronal activity and behavioral results and to predict the possible neuronal origins of the spread, we built a computational model based on known characteristics of the visual cortex. The simulation results showed that the model could successfully capture the pattern of the behavioral results. Furthermore, the pattern of the optimized receptive field sizes suggests that mid-level visual areas, such as V4, could be critically involved in TAE and its spread across the visual field.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据