4.7 Article

Development of a recombinant reporter Getah virus for antiviral drug screening assays

期刊

VETERINARY MICROBIOLOGY
卷 281, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2023.109742

关键词

Getah virus; Reverse genetics; Reporter virus; Antiviral drug discovery

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study developed three recombinant viruses by inserting different reporter protein genes between the Cap and pE2 genes. The reporter viruses exhibited high replication capacity and were genetically stable. The rGECGFP virus facilitated antiviral assays against GETV and showed inhibitory effect on GETV replication. These reporter viruses are useful for assessing viral replication and proliferation, understanding virus-host interactions, and screening antiviral compounds.
Getah virus (GETV), is an often neglected and re-emerging mosquito-borne RNA virus. GETV can cause illness accompanied with high fever, rash, incapacitating arthralgia and chronic arthritis or encephalitic disease in affected animals. Currently, there is no specific treatment or vaccine against GETV infection. In this study, we developed three recombinant viruses by inserting different reporter protein genes between the Cap and pE2 genes. The reporter viruses exhibited high replication capacity similar to the parental virus. The rGECiLOV and rGECGFP viruses were genetically stable within at least ten rounds of passages in BHK-21 cells. We confirmed that the reporter virus, rGECGFP, facilitated the antiviral assays against GETV by testing it with the known inhibitor, ribavirin. It was also found that the compound, doxycycline, showed an inhibitory effect on GETV replication. In addition, rGECGFP was found to be an authentic mimic of the parental virus infection in 3-day-old mice, but with milder pathogenicity. The reporter viruses will contribute to the assessment of viral replication and proliferation, tracking and elucidating of alphavirus-host interactions. In addition, they will help in the screening of potential antiviral compounds.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据