4.6 Article

Annealing of Cu nanolayers on glass: Structural, mechanical and thermodynamic analysis

期刊

VACUUM
卷 212, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.vacuum.2023.111991

关键词

Copper; Glass; Sputtering; Annealing; Surface properties; Thermodynamic analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Thin Cu nanolayers were deposited on glass substrates by magnetron sputtering. Post-deposition annealing at 300 degrees C under atmospheric conditions caused dramatic changes in the Cu layers, including the formation of CuO. The annealed Cu layers exhibited softer properties, decreased adhesion, and higher hydrophobicity.
Thin Cu nanolayers were deposited on glass substrates by magnetron sputtering. Consequent post-deposition annealing at 300 degrees C under atmospheric conditions served to form stable oxide layers. X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) demonstrated that as-sputtered Cu layers on glass were composed of Cu0, Cu1+ and Cu2+ oxidation states and had fcc structure according to X-ray diffraction (XRD). As-sputtered Cu layers on glass further showed a crack-like structure with islands on Scanning electron (SEM) and Atomic force microscope (AFM) images and similar properties to bulk Cu such as low sheet electrical resistance (102 & omega;) and a typical surface plasmon resonance band in UV-Vis spectra (650 nm). Owing to annealing, Cu layers on glass demon-strated dramatic changes and a loss of bulk Cu behaviour. XPS and XRD analysis confirmed that annealing caused the formation of CuO, which had a monoclinic structure. Both the annealed and as-sputtered Cu layers on glass acquired more hydrophobic character with aging time (from 65 degrees to 103 degrees). Nanoindentation measurements revealed that annealing produces softer layers with pronounced loss of adhesion and a higher cohesive strength. Thermodynamic calculations confirmed our experimental data. Cu layers on glass have a huge potential in photovoltaics, catalysis and antibacterial surfaces.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据