4.4 Article

Do Articles Shared by Academic Medicine Social Media Influencers Drive Future Citation Rates?

期刊

UROLOGY
卷 178, 期 -, 页码 167-172

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2023.05.009

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to assess the role of influential figures within social media in driving future citations. It found that while social media posts were associated with increased visibility and higher future citation rates, social media influencers did not appear to drive these outcomes. Instead, factors such as study quality and accessibility were more predictive of future citations. Therefore, high-quality and open access articles are more likely to be cited.
OBJECTIVE To assess the role of influential figures within social media (SoMe) in driving future citations. METHODS All original articles published in the Journal of Urology and European Urology in 2018 were identified. For each article, number of mentions on any SoMe platform, article's Twitter reach, and total citations were collected. Article characteristics such as type of study, article topic, and open access status were identified. Total academic research output was obtained for first and last authors of included articles. Influential SoMe figures were defined as users that tweeted about included articles and had over 2000 followers. For these accounts, we collected total followers, total tweets, engagement statistics, verification status, and academic characteristics such as total citations and total prior publications. The impact of SoMe, article, and academic characteristics on future citations was assessed using panel data regression analysis. RESULTS We identified 394 articles with 8895 total citations and 460 SoMe influencers. On panel data regression modeling, tweets about a specific article were associated with future citations (0.17 citations per tweet about an article, P <.001). SoMe influencer characteristics were not associated with increased citations (P >.05). The following non-SoMe-associated characteristics were predictive of future citations (P <.001): study type (prospective studies received 12.9 more citations than cross-sectional studies), open access status (4.3 citations more if open access, P <.001), and previously wellpublished first and last authors. CONCLUSION While SoMe posts are associated with increased visibility and higher future citation rates, SoMe influencers do not appear to drive these outcomes. Instead, high quality and accessibility were more predictive of future citability. UROLOGY 178: 167-172, 2023. (c) 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据