4.3 Article

Assessing the resilience of circularity in water management: a modeling framework to redesign and stress-test regional systems under uncertainty

期刊

URBAN WATER JOURNAL
卷 20, 期 5, 页码 532-549

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/1573062X.2023.2190030

关键词

Resilience; water simulation; sustainability; circular economy; urban water cycle models; decentralised technologies

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Contrary to conventional management, circular economy design principles offer a resource management alternative that reduces waste and promotes efficiency. This study quantitatively demonstrates the links between circularity and resilience in water management, showing that circular water options lead to more resilient water systems. By addressing different circular dimensions, the resilience profiles of water systems become more robust across various water cycle domains.
Contrary to the 'make-use-dispose' linearity of conventional management, circular economy design principles have been proposed as a resource management alternative that reduces waste and promotes efficiency. These principles also find use in water management, offering an alternative against centralized models. Despite the intrinsic links between circularity and resilience, few studies have advanced the identification and discussion of linkage beyond a theoretical or conceptual level. This study presents quantitative links between circularity and resilience, by demonstrating how different circular water management strategies lead to improved resilience performance for a regional urban-rural water system. A stress-testing framework based on a water cycle model is presented, where different circular interventions are evaluated in terms of their overall resilience against future uncertainty. The results demonstrate that circular water options lead to more resilient water systems. The more circular dimensions are addressed through interventions, the more robust resilience profiles become across different water cycle domains.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据