4.7 Review

Promoting self-determination, minimizing green gentrification, and maximizing community benefits in urban forestry expansion: A systematic review

期刊

URBAN FORESTRY & URBAN GREENING
卷 84, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2023.127933

关键词

Urban forestry; Ecosystem services; Environmental justice; Eco-gentrification; Participatory urban planning

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The purpose of this systematic review is to investigate how urban forest expansion processes can be carried out equitably to improve environmental conditions in U.S. cities. The study examines the association between urban forest coverage and gentrification and residential displacement indicators, as well as the implementation of participatory planning in urban forest expansion projects.
The purpose of this systematic review is to investigate how urban forest expansion processes can most equitably be carried out to improve environmental conditions in U.S. cities. In hopes of informing future environmental planning efforts that center racial and socioeconomic justice, this study examines existing literature in two ways. First, this study gathers existing research looking at associations between urban forest coverage and indicators of gentrification and residential displacement to better understand eco-gentrification risks. Second, this study assesses how participatory planning has been carried out in urban forest expansion projects and compiles descriptive findings and best practices noted in the literature. Findings show a need for further research looking specifically at associations between urban forest expansion and diverse indicators of gentrification and residential displacement, such as demographic shifts in neighborhood populations over time, and temporal changes in rental prices depending on a neighborhood's proximity to different forms and magnitudes of urban forest expansion. Publications related to participatory urban forestry planning point to the importance of: (a) prioritizing the needs and goals of community members to best utilize local knowledge, rebuild trust in government, and repair historic harm; and (b) creating opportunities for community members to participate in planning processes that are accessible logistically, economically, and socially.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据