4.0 Article

Paternal and Maternal Problem Drinking and Lifetime Problem Drinking of Their Adult Children

期刊

TWIN RESEARCH AND HUMAN GENETICS
卷 26, 期 2, 页码 152-163

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/thg.2023.12

关键词

Adult children; alcohol drinking; cohort studies; problem drinking; parents

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Parents' alcohol use is associated with alcohol use of their adolescent offspring, and this association extends to the adulthood of the offspring. This was found in a prospective study using a population-based Finnish twin-family cohort. The study showed that parental problem drinking was modestly associated with lifetime problem drinking of their adult children, even when the children had reached their thirties.
Parents' alcohol use is associated with alcohol use of their adolescent offspring, but does this association extend to the adulthood of the offspring? We examined associations of paternal and maternal problem drinking with lifetime problem drinking of their adult offspring prospectively assessed in a population-based Finnish twin-family cohort (FinnTwin16). Problem drinking (Malmo-modified Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test) was self-reported separately by mothers and fathers when their children were 16. The children reported on an extended lifetime version of the same measure during their mid-twenties (21-28 years) and mid-thirties (31-37 years). 1235 sons and 1461 daughters in mid-twenties and 991 sons and 1278 daughters in mid-thirties had complete data. Correlations between fathers' and their adult children's problem drinking ranged from .12 to .18. For mothers and their adult children, these correlations ranged from .09 to .14. In multivariate models, adjustment for potential confounders had little effect on the observed associations. In this study, parental problem drinking was modestly associated with lifetime problem drinking of their adult children. This association could be detected even when the children had reached the fourth decade of life.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据