4.7 Article

On cutting transport for air reverse circulation in horizontal and inclined wells

期刊

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tust.2023.105095

关键词

Reverse circulation; Air drilling; Horizontal wells; Cutting transport; CFD simulation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Air reverse circulation (RC) drilling is popular in tunnel drilling, but poor cutting transport efficiency can cause issues such as stuck pipes and severe bit wear. This study used computational fluid dynamics simulation to analyze the impact of various parameters on cutting transport in a drill pipe. The results showed that air velocity had a limited impact on transport efficiency, the optimal cutting concentration was approximately 20%, and factors like ROP and cutting diameter were correlated with transport efficiency.
Air reverse circulation (RC) drilling has drawn considerable interest and has been adopted in tunnel drilling owing to its beneficial features. Cutting transport is a primary concern in RC drilling because poor cutting transport efficiency may lead to several problems, such as stuck pipes, excessive torque and drag, and severe bit wear. The Euler-Euler method of computational fluid dynamics simulation was applied to model the gas-solid two-phase flow in a drill pipe to determine the influence of various parameters on cutting transport. The effects of the air velocity, cutting concentration, rate of penetration (ROP), particle diameter, and inclination angle were investigated by analyzing the variation in the pressure drop, characteristics of cutting motion, and efficiency of cutting transport. The results revealed that the positive contribution of air velocity to transport efficiency was restricted. The optimal concentration of cuttings was approximately 20 %. The pressure drop, average volume fraction, and cutting migration ratio tended to be positively correlated with the ROP. An increase in the cutting diameter led to a decrease in transport efficiency. At an inclination of 30 degrees, the least cutting transport efficiency was observed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据