4.6 Article

Inhibitory effect of Gardenblue blueberry (Vaccinium ashei Reade) anthocyanin extracts on lipopolysaccharide-stimulated inflammatory response in RAW 264.7 cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY-SCIENCE B
卷 17, 期 6, 页码 425-436

出版社

ZHEJIANG UNIV
DOI: 10.1631/jzus.B1500213

关键词

Gardenblue blueberry (Vaccinium ashei Reade) anthocyanin extracts (GBBAEs); Anti-inflammatory; RAW 264.7; Cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2); Nuclear factor-kappa B p65 (NF-kappa Bp65)

资金

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China [2013PY095]
  2. Clinical Research Project of Health and Family Planning Commission of Wuhan Municipality [WX13A05]
  3. Research Project of Wuhan City Central Hospital [YQ15A04]
  4. Key Laboratory of Biological Targeted Therapy of Hubei Province of China [02.03.2014-10]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Blueberries are a rich source of anthocyanins, which are associated with health benefits contributing to a reduced risk for many diseases. The present study identified the functional Gardenblue blueberry (Vaccinium ashei Reade) anthocyanin extracts (GBBAEs) and evaluated their capacity and underlying mechanisms in protecting murine RAW 264.7 cells from lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-stimulated inflammation in vitro. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit results showed that GBBAEs significantly inhibited the production of nitric oxide (NO), prostaglandin E-2 (PGE(2)), interleukin-6 (IL-6), IL-1 beta, and interferon-gamma (INF-gamma). Real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis indicated that the mRNA expression levels of IL-6, IL-1 beta, tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), and cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2) were suppressed in LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7 cells. Additionally, Western blot analysis was used to evaluate the relative protein expression levels of COX-2 and nuclear factor-kappa B p65 (NF-kappa Bp65). All these results suggested the potential use of GBBAEs as a functional food for the treatment of inflammatory diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据