4.5 Article

Multiple Scratching: An Atomistic Study

期刊

TRIBOLOGY LETTERS
卷 71, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s11249-023-01718-3

关键词

Nanoscratching; Friction; Molecular dynamics; Hardness

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Using molecular dynamics simulation, the authors investigated multiple scratching processes where a tip moves through a previously formed groove. They compared a single scratch to a 2-cycle scratch and observed that the second cycle showed a smaller friction coefficient if the tip moved through the pre-formed groove without touching the front end. They also studied 5 cycles of scratching, confirming and generalizing the findings for the 2-cycle scratch.
Using molecular dynamics simulation, we investigate multiple scratching processes in which a tip moves through a groove that has already been formed during a previous scratch. We use a conical indenter such that the friction coefficient is independent of the scratch depth. First, a single scratch to a depth of 4 nm is compared with a 2-cycle scratch in which a scratch at depth 2 nm is followed by a second scratch to the full depth of 4 nm. We observe that the second cycle shows a smaller friction coefficient as long as the tip moves through the pre-formed groove without touching the front end. In addition, we studied 5 cycles of scratching, in which the scratch depth was increased by 2 nm in each cycle. These results confirm and generalize the findings for the 2-cycle scratch. A constant-load 2-cycle scratch simulation emphasizes that the reduction in transverse load-and, consequently, in the friction coefficient-is caused by the fact that, despite a large normal area supporting the normal load, only a thin area is available to resist the transverse movement of the scratch tip. The work done during scratching is in good approximation proportional to the scratch volume showing that the transverse hardness is approximately constant in all scratch processes investigated here.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据