4.7 Article

Multi-objective optimization of tool wear, surface roughness, and material removal rate in finishing honing processes using adaptive neural fuzzy inference systems

期刊

TRIBOLOGY INTERNATIONAL
卷 182, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.triboint.2023.108354

关键词

Roughness; Cylindricity; Tool wear; Material removal rate; Honing; ANFIS; Modeling

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, ANFIS models and multi-objective optimization were used to study tool wear, roughness, cylindricity, and material removal rate in finishing honing processes. The study found that low grain size, pressure, and linear velocity are recommended for minimizing roughness, cylindricity error, and tool wear. The evaluation of density and tangential velocity depends on the optimization algorithm employed.
Honing processes are usually employed to manufacture combustion engine cylinders and hydraulic cylinders. Honing provides a crosshatch pattern that favors the oil flow. In this paper, Adaptive Neural Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) models were obtained for tool wear, average roughness Ra, cylindricity and material removal rate in finishing honing processes. In addition, multi-objective optimization with the desirability function method was applied, in order to determine the process parameters that allow minimizing roughness, cylindricity error and tool wear, while maximizing material removal rate. The results showed that grain size and tangential velocity should be at their minimum levels, while density, pressure and linear velocity should be at their maximum levels. If only roughness, cylindricity error and tool wear are considered, then low grain size, low pressure and low linear velocity are recommended, while density and tangential velocity vary, depending on the optimization algorithm employed. This work will help to select appropriate process parameters in finishing honing processes, when roughness, cylindricity error and tool wear are to be minimized.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据