4.7 Article

Investigation of different transfer functions for modeling the dynamic viscosity of hybrid nanolubricant containing MWCNTs and MgO nanoparticles using the response surface methodology (RSM)

期刊

TRIBOLOGY INTERNATIONAL
卷 183, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.triboint.2023.108370

关键词

Transfer functions; Response surface methodology (RSM); Dynamic viscosity; Hybrid nanofluid

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The viscosity of 10W40-based hybrid nanofluid was modeled using response surface methodology (RSM). Four transfer functions were evaluated, and the square root transfer function showed the best performance.
In this investigation, to derive the model and find the most impact, response surface methodology (RSM) is used. In the RSM, range selected for each factor is very important. The range of each factor must be coded and placed in the range of -1-1 so that the regression analysis can be performed well because the unit of the independent variables is not the same and even if the range is the same, the ranges are not the same. the viscosity of 10W40based hybrid nanofluid (HNF) has been modeled using the response surface methodology (RSM). The presented data for this modeling are so extensive that the ratio of maximum to a minimum was 20.8 and the need to use the transfer function is felt. Four transfer functions of Natural-Log, Log1c, Square-Root and Inverse-Sqrt are selected for review and the best function is introduced. Parameters R2, Adjusted R2, Predicted R2, C.V (%) and the distance of the parameters from the best are considered as criteria for selecting the best transfer function. The results show that the Square Root transfer function has the best performance such that the values of R2, Pre-dicted-R2, Adjusted-R2, C.V and the distance of the parameters from the best are equal to 0.9999, 0.9998, 0.9998, 0.5517 and 0.17, respectively, which shows the high precision of this transfer function. The Inverse-Sqrt transfer function also has the weakest performance among the studied transfer functions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据