4.4 Article

Evaluating the completeness of the reporting of abstracts since the publication of the CONSORT extension for abstracts: an evaluation of randomized controlled trial in ten nursing journals

期刊

TRIALS
卷 24, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07419-5

关键词

Abstracts; Randomized controlled trials; Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials for Abstracts

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated whether abstract reports in nursing adhered to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials for Abstracts (CONSORT-A) guideline after 2010, and explored factors associated with adherence. The study found that adherence to abstract reporting in nursing literature has improved since the CONSORT-A era, but overall completeness of RCT abstracts remained low.
BackgroundAs a practice-oriented discipline, strict adherence to reporting guidelines is particularly important in randomized controlled trial (RCT) abstracts of the nursing area. However, whether abstract reports after 2010 have complied with the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials for Abstracts (CONSORT-A) guideline is unclear. This study aimed to evaluate whether the publication of CONSORT-A has improved abstract reporting in nursing and explores the factors associated with better adherence to the guidelines.MethodsWe searched the Web of Science for 200 RCTs randomly selected from ten nursing journals. We used a data extraction form based on CONSORT-A, including 16 items, to analyze the reporting adherence to the guidelines, and the reporting rate of each item and the total score for each abstract were used to indicate adherence and overall quality score (OQS, range 0-16). A comparison of the total mean score between the two periods was made, and affecting factors were analyzed.ResultsIn the studies we included, 48 abstracts were published pre-CONSORT-A whereas 152 post-CONSORT-A. The overall mean score for reporting adherence to 16 items was 7.41 & PLUSMN; 2.78 and 9.16 & PLUSMN; 2.76 for pre- and post-CONSORT-A, respectively (total score: 16). The most poorly reported items are harms (0%), outcomes in method (8.5%), randomization (25%), and blinding (6.5%). Items including the year of publication, impact factor, multiple center trial, word count, and structured abstract are significantly associated with higher adherence.ConclusionsThe adherence to abstract reporting in nursing literature has improved since the CONSORT-A era, but the overall completeness of RCT abstracts remained low. A joint effort by authors, editors, and journals is necessary to improve reporting quality of RCT abstracts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据