4.7 Article

Unravelling the aroma and flavour of algae for future food applications

期刊

TRENDS IN FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 138, 期 -, 页码 370-381

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE LONDON
DOI: 10.1016/j.tifs.2023.06.018

关键词

Algae; Aroma; Flavour; Food application; Volatile analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In order to promote the use of algae in food products, it is important to understand the aroma and flavor components of algae and optimize their sensory properties for different food applications. Volatile analysis of algae is a promising method to identify suitable algae for future food development.
Background: To increase uptake of algae in food products, it is essential to understand aroma and flavour components in algae to optimise their sensory properties to suit various food applications. Volatile analysis of algae is a promising tool for identification of suitable algae application for future food development.Scope and approach: This review identified key aroma-active volatile compounds across fifteen algae species; and the impact of taxonomy, environment as well as various processing methods on those key volatile profiles is discussed. In addition, volatile profiles of algae allow for quality assessment of algae. This includes monitoring of volatile changes that may occur during farming and post-harvest processing, thereby ensuring that desired aroma and flavour profiles are achieved.Key findings and conclusions: A total of 69 volatile compounds were identified as odour active across 15 species, with aldehydes being the largest contributor based on the total number of key volatile compounds present. Through a standardised assessment of volatile compounds in algae, species specific changes in volatiles can be observed and comparisons drawn across a range of species. Allowing for incorporation of algae and algal components into a broader variety of food applications with increased consumer acceptance, thereby meeting the demand for sustainable food sources in the future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据