4.5 Article

Efficient Algorithms for Stochastic Ride-Pooling Assignment with Mixed Fleets

期刊

TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

INFORMS
DOI: 10.1287/trsc.2021.0349

关键词

ride-pooling assignment problem; approximation algorithm; mixed autonomy traffic

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates the use of ride-pooling in mobility-on-demand (MoD) systems to enhance efficiency. Two approximation algorithms are proposed to solve the vehicle repositioning and ride-pooling assignment problem. The experiments show that these algorithms can parallelize computations and achieve optimal solutions with small gaps.
Ride-pooling, which accommodates multiple passenger requests in a single trip, has the potential to substantially enhance the throughput of mobility-on-demand (MoD) systems. This paper investigates MoD systems that operate mixed fleets composed of basic supply and augmented supply vehicles. When the basic supply is insufficient to satisfy demand, augmented supply vehicles can be repositioned to serve rides at a higher operational cost. We formulate the joint vehicle repositioning and ride-pooling assignment problem as a two-stage stochastic integer program, where repositioning augmented supply vehicles precedes the realization of ride requests. Sequential ride-pooling assignments aim to maximize total utility or profit on a shareability graph: a hypergraph representing the matching compatibility between available vehicles and pending requests. Two approximation algorithms for midcapacity and high-capacity vehicles are proposed in this paper; the respective approximation ratios are 1/p2 and (e � 1)/(2e + o(1))plnp, where p is the maximum vehicle capacity plus one. Our study evaluates the performance of these approximation algorithms using an MoD simulator, demonstrating that these algorithms can parallelize computations and achieve solutions with small optimality gaps (typically within 1%). These efficient algorithms pave the way for various multimodal and multiclass MoD applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据