4.2 Article

Metabolic effects of radiation on red blood cells from cold stored whole blood

期刊

TRANSFUSION
卷 63, 期 -, 页码 S199-S207

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/trf.17345

关键词

ATP; blood storage; GTP; ionizing radiation; red blood cells

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Experimental results show that even if exposed to radiation, the energy metabolome of red blood cells in cold stored whole blood is not significantly affected, indicating that it can still be used for resuscitation in trauma patients.
BackgroundThe risk of military and civilian radiation exposure is increasing, and determining the effects of exposure is a high priority. Irradiation of the nearby blood supply after a nuclear event may impede mobilization of blood products for resuscitation at a time of great need. RBCs are administered to patients with trauma and hemorrhage to transport and deliver oxygen and avoid tissue hypoxia. Here we determine the effects of ionizing radiation on the energy metabolome of RBCs isolated from cold stored whole blood to determine if their stability is compromised by radiation exposure. Study Design and MethodsWhole blood from healthy volunteers was subjected to 0, 25, or 75 Gy of X-irradiation, and stored at 4 degrees C. RBCs were isolated from stored WB at 0, 1, 7, 14, and 21 days of storage. The levels of extracted Krebs cycle intermediates, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotides, and phosphorylated derivatives of adenosine and guanosine were determined by tandem mass spectroscopy. ResultsIrradiation at either 25Gy or 75Gy had no significant effect on any parameter measured compared to control (0Gy). However, there was a significant change over time in storage for ATP, GDP, and guanosine. DiscussionIrradiation at doses up to 75Gy had no effect on the energy metabolome of RBCs prepared from blood stored at 4 degrees C for up to 21 days, suggesting that the RBC energy metabolome is not affected by radiation exposure and the blood can still be used for resuscitation in trauma patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据