4.7 Article

Tensile property and microstructure of Al-4.77Mn-1.37Mg-0.67Sc-0.25Zr alloy under different selective laser melting processing parameters

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/S1003-6326(22)66112-0

关键词

selective laser melting; aluminium alloys; tensile property; strengthening mechanism; microstructure

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new Al-4.77Mn-1.37Mg-0.67Sc-0.25Zr alloy was prepared using selective laser melting technique, and its microstructure and mechanical properties were investigated. The alloy exhibited relatively stable mechanical properties when the energy density ranged from 104 to 143 J/mm3, with yield strength, ultimate tensile strength, and elongation values of 335-338 MPa, 397-400 MPa, and above 11%, respectively. However, when the energy density exceeded 152 J/mm3, the alloy showed the formation of cavities and cracks, leading to a sharp decrease in elongation. Quantitative calculations revealed that solid solution strengthening, grain boundary strengthening, and precipitation strengthening accounted for 44%, 41%, and 15% of the total strengthening, respectively.
A new Al-4.77Mn-1.37Mg-0.67Sc-0.25Zr alloy (wt.%) was prepared by selective laser melting (SLM) technique under different processing parameters, and the microstructure and mechanical property of the SLM alloys were investigated by tensile tests and microscopy methods. The results show that when the energy density ranges from 104 to 143 J/mm3, the mechanical properties remain relatively stable. The yield strength, ultimate tensile strength and elongation are 335-338 MPa, 397-400 MPa and above 11%, respectively. Meanwhile, few defects and coarse intermetallics form and lots of fine AlFeMnScZr phases precipitate. When the energy density exceeds 152 J/mm3, some cavities and cracks can be observed, and elongation decreases sharply. The quantitative calculation results show that the solid solution strengthening, grain boundary strengthening and precipitation strengthening account for 44%, 41% and 15%, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据