4.4 Article

A proteomic overview of the major venom components from Tityus championi from Panama

期刊

TOXICON
卷 227, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2023.107082

关键词

Proteomics; Scorpion; Toxicity; Venom; Tityus

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In recent years, there has been an increase in morbidity caused by Tityus championi scorpion sting in Panama. The LD50 of the venom was determined to be 2.9 mg/kg through intravenous injection. Toxic fractions of the venom were identified and tested in mice to find the most toxic fractions to mammals. Additionally, the venom fractions were tested against invertebrates to search for insect-specific toxin peptides. The primary structures of the most relevant venom peptides were obtained, with one of the neurotoxic peptides being found in at least four other Tityus species in Panama. This neurotoxin could be an important protein target for developing antivenoms against the sting of this Panamanian scorpion or other relevant Tityus species.
In recent years, morbidity caused by scorpion sting of the species Tityus championi has increased in Panama. Therefore, the LD50 was determined by intravenous injection in 2.9 mg/kg and the venom of T. championi was separated using a HPLC system and their fractions were tested for biological activities in mice to identify the most toxic fractions to mammals. In addition, the venom fractions were also tested against invertebrates to look for insect-specific toxin peptides. The most toxic fractions were analyzed by MS/MS spectrometry. The primary structures of T. championi venom peptides with the most relevant activity were obtained, and the primary structure of one of most neurotoxic peptides was found at least in other four species of Tityus from Panama. This neurotoxin is quite important to be used as a protein target to be neutralized if developing antivenoms against the sting of this Panamanian scorpion or other relevant species of genera Tityus in the country.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据