4.4 Article

Influence of Support Structure on Catalytic Performance of Supported Liquid-Phase (SLP) Catalysts in Hydroformylation of 1-Butene

期刊

TOPICS IN CATALYSIS
卷 66, 期 17-18, 页码 1440-1450

出版社

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s11244-023-01792-w

关键词

SLP catalyst; Hydroformylation; Heterogenization; Silicon carbide; Monolith; Porosity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, several supported liquid-phase (SLP) catalysts with immobilized Rh-biphephos complexes were prepared and used for continuous gas-phase hydroformylation of 1-butene. The SLP catalysts showed higher catalytic activity and selectivity towards the preferred linear aldehyde compared to the supports with smaller sized silica nanoparticles. Importantly, the prepared SLP catalyst systems demonstrated long-term stability in the hydroformylation reaction without significant formation of unwanted by-products.
Several supported liquid-phase (SLP) catalysts with immobilized Rh-biphephos complexes on monolithic supports were prepared and applied for continuous gas-phase hydroformylation (HyFo) of 1-butene. The support comprised macroporous monolithic silicon carbide (SiC) with deposited silica nanoparticles (NPs) in order to provide mesopores with enhanced capillary forces to retain the liquid-phase. Variable parameters were examined for the monolithic SiC supports, including size and loading of deposited silica NPs and intermediate calcination between silica deposition steps to obtain the most efficient support configuration for the SLP system. The SLP catalysts with larger deposited silica NPs gave higher catalytic activity (i.e. 1-butene conversion and turnover frequency) compared to the supports with smaller sized silica NPs. However, the selectivity towards the preferred linear aldehyde was higher in the SLP catalysts with supports containing less silica with small silica NPs. Importantly, the prepared SLP catalyst systems showed long-term stability in HyFo with negligible formation of high boiling aldol condensation products.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据