期刊
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES
卷 37, 期 7, 页码 5482-5493出版社
SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10028-7
关键词
Laparoscopic liver resection; Liver; Oncology; Minimal-invasive; Hand-assisted; Laparoscopic-assisted; Hybrid
类别
During the learning curve, both laparoscopic-assisted and hand-assisted liver resections have inferior perioperative outcomes compared to pure laparoscopic liver resections.
BackgroundLaparoscopic-assisted (LALR) and hand-assisted (HALR) liver resections have been utilized during the early adoption phase by surgeons when transitioning from open surgery to pure LLR. To date, there are limited data reporting on the outcomes of LALR or HALR compared to LLR. The objective was to compare the perioperative outcomes after LALR and HALR versus pure LLR.MethodsThis is an international multicentric analysis of 6609 patients undergoing minimal-invasive liver resection at 21 centers between 2004 and 2019. Perioperative outcomes were analyzed after propensity score matching (PSM) comparison between LALR and HALR versus LLR.Results5279 cases met study criteria of whom 5033 underwent LLR (95.3%), 146 underwent LALR (2.8%) and 100 underwent HALR (1.9%). After 1:4 PSM, LALR was associated with inferior outcomes as evidenced by the longer postoperative stay, higher readmission rate, higher major morbidity rate and higher in-hospital mortality rate. Similarly, 1:6 PSM comparison between HALR and LLR also demonstrated poorer outcomes associated with HALR as demonstrated by the higher open conversion rate and higher blood transfusion rate. All 3 approaches technical variants demonstrated the same oncological radicality (R1 rate).ConclusionLALR and HALR performed during the learning curve was associated with inferior perioperative outcomes compared to pure LLR.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据