4.7 Article

Vehicle Scanning Method for Bridges Enhanced by Dual Amplifiers

期刊

出版社

JOHN WILEY & SONS LTD
DOI: 10.1155/2023/6906855

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dual-function amplifiers are proposed to enhance the capability of a scanning test vehicle for bridges. Closed-form solutions are derived for the dynamic responses, and the amplification factors of the amplifiers and vehicle are presented for assessing the transmissibility. It is concluded that the bridge amplifier performs better in extracting bridge frequencies, the vehicle damper can suppress the effect of vehicle's frequency, and the bridge frequencies can be well detected even for rough pavement.
Dual-function amplifiers are proposed for the first time herein for enhancing the capability of a scanning test vehicle for bridges. To start, closed-form solutions are derived for the dynamic responses of the amplifier-vehicle-bridge system with a moving test vehicle. Then, the dynamic amplification factors of the amplifier and vehicle are presented for assessing the bridge/vehicle and vehicle/amplifier transmissibility. It was known that the spectrum of the vehicle may be hindered for extracting the bridge frequencies because of vehicle frequency and rough pavement. Two differentially tuned amplifiers are called on to tackle the problem: one (i.e., the vehicle damper) is to suppress the effect of vehicle's frequency, acting like the tuned mass damper (TMD), and the other (i.e., the bridge amplifier) is to enlarge the amplitude of bridge frequency of concern. Based on the parametric study, it is concluded that (1) the bridge amplifier performs better than the vehicle one in extracting bridge frequencies by increasing their visibility in the spectrum; (2) the effect of vehicle's frequency can be suppressed by tuning the vehicle damper such that it functions like a TMD of the vehicle; (3) by tuning the bridge amplifier to any of the first few bridge frequencies, the latter can be well detected even for rough pavement.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据