4.7 Article

The long-run analysis of COVID-19 dynamic using random evolution, peak detection and time series

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00477-023-02455-8

关键词

COVID-19; Random evolution; Dichotomous Markov Noise; ARIMA; SARIMA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper studies the short and long-run behavior of COVID-19 and analyzes the long-term behavior of the pandemic in different countries using a random evolution model. The simplicity of the model makes it a practical tool for decision-making based on the long-run behavior of the pandemic. The study shows that different phases of the pandemic and measures such as vaccination have an impact on decision-making.
It is now almost three years that COVID-19 has been the cause of misery for millions of people around the world. Many countries are in process of vaccination. Due to the social complexity of the problem, the future of decisions is not clear. As such, there is a need for the mathematical modeling to predict the long-run behavior of the COVID-19 dynamic for the decision-making with regard to the result of the pandemic on the economy, health, and others. In this paper, we have studied the short and long-run behavior of COVID-19. In a novel way, random evolution (Trichotomous and Dichotomous Markov Noise) is used to model and analyze the long-run behavior of the pandemic in different phases of the pandemic in different countries. On the given conditions, the random evolution model can help us establish the long-run asymptotic behaviour of the pandemic. This allows us to consider different phases of the pandemic as well as the effect of vaccination and other measures taken. The simplicity of the model makes it a practical tool for decision-making based on the long-run behavior of the pandemic. As such, we have established a criterion for the comparison of different regions and countries in different phases. In this regard, we have used real pandemic data from different countries to validate our results.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据