4.8 Article

Luminescent Carbon Nanodots Doped with Gadolinium (III): Purification Criteria, Chemical and Biological Characterization of a New Dual Fluorescence/MR Imaging Agent

期刊

SMALL
卷 19, 期 31, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/smll.202206442

关键词

carbon nanodots; gadolinium nanoparticles; magnetic resonance imaging; nanomedicine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Carbon Dots (CDs) are luminescent quasi-spherical nanoparticles with various applications. New gadolinium-doped CDs, Gd@CNDs, are presented as multifunctional probes for MRI. These Gd@CNDs show good homogeneity, stability, and biocompatibility, making them potential candidates for both MR and fluorescence imaging.
Carbon Dots (CDs) are luminescent quasi-spherical nanoparticles, possessing water solubility, high biocompatibility, and tunable chemical and physical properties for a wide range of applications, including nanomedicine and theranostics. The evaluation of new purification criteria, useful to achieve more reliable CDs, free from the interference of artifacts, is currently an object of debate in the field. Here, new CDs doped with gadolinium (Gd (III)), named Gd@CNDs, are presented as multifunctional probes for Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). This new system is a case of study, to evaluate and/or combine different purification strategies, as a crucial approach to generate CDs with a better performance. Indeed, these new amorphous Gd@CNDs display good homogeneity, and they are free from emissive side products. Gd@CNDs (7-10 nm) contain 7% of Gd (III) w/w, display suitable and stable longitudinal relaxivity (r(1)) and with emissive behavior, therefore potentially useful for both MR and fluorescence imaging. They show good biocompatibility in both cellular and in vivo studies, cell permeability, and the ability to generate contrast in cellular pellets. Finally, MRI recording T-1-weighted images on mice after intravenous injection of Gd@CNDs, show signal enhancement in the liver, spleen, and kidney 30 min postinjection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据