4.8 Article

Construction of Covalent Organic Framework Nanofiber Membranes for Efficient Adsorption of Antibiotics

期刊

SMALL
卷 19, 期 26, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/smll.202301200

关键词

antibiotic adsorption; covalent organic frameworks; nanofiber membranes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A facile strategy is presented to prepare flexible COF nanofiber membranes by in-situ growth of COFs on PAN nanofiber substrates. The obtained PAN@COF nanofiber membranes combine a large functional surface with efficient mass transport, making them promising for various applications. The method can be extended to different Schiff base-derived COF materials, providing an efficient way to construct flexible COF-based membranes.
Techniques beyond crystal engineering are critical for manufacturing covalent organic frameworks (COFs) and to explore them for advanced applications. However, COFs are normally obtained as insoluble, unmeltable, and thus nonprocessible microcrystalline powders. Therefore, it is a significant challenge to implement COFs into larger architectures and structural control on different length scales. Herein, a facile strategy is presented to prepare flexible COF nanofiber membranes by in-situ growth of COFs on polyacrylonitrile (PAN) nanofiber substrates via a reversible polycondensation-termination approach. The obtained PAN@COF nanofiber membranes with vertically aligned COF nanoplates combine a large functional surface with efficient mass transport, thus making it a promising adsorbent, for example, for water purification. The antibiotic pollutant ofloxacin (OFX) is removed from water with a superior absorption capacity of approximate to 236 mg g(-1) and removal efficiency as high as 98%. The here presented in-situ growth of COFs on nanofiber membranes can be extended to various Schiff base-derived COF materials with different compositions, providing a highly efficient way to construct flexible COF-based membranes for several applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据