4.7 Article

The regulation of generation rate facilitates the win-win of ROS yield and utilization efficiency in heterogeneous persulfate catalytic oxidation system

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2023.124389

关键词

AOPs; PMS; Reactive oxygen species; Utilization efficiency; Phosphate

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cu-based composite oxides (CuOMOx) were synthesized and used as catalysts to activate permonosulfate (PMS) for the degradation of complex organic pollutants. The addition of phosphate was effective in regulating the generation rate of reactive oxygen species (ROS), improving their utilization efficiency, and achieving a win-win situation of ROS yield and utilization efficiency in heterogeneous catalytic oxidation systems.
Heterogeneous catalytic oxidation is one of the most effective methods to degrade various and complex organic pollutants in aqueous solution. Increasing reactive oxygen species (ROS) yield has always been the main objective to improve the oxidation efficiency. However, the mass production of ROS in a short time is inevitably faced with self-quenching and ineffective consumption. Herein, Cu-based composite oxides (CuOMOx) (M = Ca, Mg, Zn, Mn) were synthesized and used for catalytic activation of permonosulfate (PMS). Although the introduction of unreducible metal oxides significantly improved the activation efficiency of PMS, the abnormal phenomenon of lower substrate degradation efficiency and PMS stoichiometry appeared. The underlying mechanism is that the rapid production of ROS results in a mismatch of the production/effective consumption ratio, which causes massive ROS disappeared naturally before attacking the substrate. In this scenario, reasonable regulation of ROS generation rate by phosphate addition improved the utilization efficiency of ROS without affecting its yield. Our finding is beneficial to achieve a win-win situation of ROS yield and utilization efficiency in heterogeneous catalytic oxidation systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据