4.7 Article

MgO-Al2O3-SiO2-ZrO2 system ceramic glass as sintering aids to fabricate Al2O3 ceramic membrane with high acid corrosion resistance

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2023.124231

关键词

Alumina ceramic membrane; Sintering aids; Ceramic glass; Acid corrosion resistance

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The high cost of ceramic membranes is caused by the high sintering temperatures. Choosing sintering aids can reduce the sintering temperature but results in low corrosion resistance. Using MgO-Al2O3-SiO2-ZrO2 ceramic glass as sintering aids increases the bending strength of alumina membrane, and MgAl2O4, Mg2SiO4, and ZrO2 crystals enhance its mechanical properties and corrosion resistance. The acid corrosion also promotes the permeability of the membrane.
The shortcoming of ceramic membranes is the high cost caused by high sintering temperatures. Sintering aids can be chosen to reduce the sintering temperature. However, it results in the low corrosion resistance, especially in corrosive wastewater treatment and membranes' chemical cleaning processes. Glass phase generated in the sintering is the main factor. In the present work, MgO-Al2O3-SiO2-ZrO2 system ceramic glass is chosen as sintering aids with a crystallinity of 89.63 %. The bending strength of the alumina membrane can be increased from 46.79 MPa of pure alumina to 111.02 MPa with 4.8 wt% ceramic glass addition. The sintering temperature of pure Al2O3 membrane is much higher than 1600 degrees C when the equal bending strength is obtained. The bending strength loss rate of the tubular ceramic membrane is only 5.13 % and 3.85 % after the static stage and dynamic separation for 36 h acid corrosion. MgAl2O4, Mg2SiO4, and ZrO2 crystals locate on alumina particles' necks and provide the membrane with excellent mechanical properties and outstanding corrosion resistance. The Al2O3 membrane has a porosity of 34.06 % and a mean pore size of 1.42 & mu;m, besides, acid corrosion can promote the permeability of membranes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据