4.7 Article

Protein adsorption to diethylaminoethyl-dextran grafted macroporous cellulose microspheres: A critical pore size for enhanced adsorption capacity and uptake kinetic

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2023.123588

关键词

Protein chromatography; Ion exchangers; Cellulose microspheres; Grafting ligand; Pore size

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, four diethylaminoethyl-dextran grafted macroporous cellulose microspheres with different pore sizes were used to investigate the adsorption equilibria and kinetics of bovine serum albumin (BSA) and gamma-globulin. The results showed that both proteins exhibited increasing-then-decreasing trends with decreasing pore size. Furthermore, a critical pore size (CPZ) was identified at which the adsorption capacity and uptake kinetics were significantly enhanced for both proteins.
To study the details of the effect of pore size on the performance of grafting-ligand ion exchangers, four diethylaminoethyl-dextran grafted macroporous cellulose microspheres with different pore sizes ranging from 164.57 to 281.96 nm were selected to investigate their adsorption equilibria and kinetics for bovine serum al-bumin (BSA) and gamma-globulin. It was found that for whether adsorption equilibria or uptake kinetics, both the proteins showed increasing-then-decreasing trends with the decreasing pore size. More importantly, for a specific protein, the maximum adsorption capacity and fastest uptake rate were achieved on the same media, indicating the existence of a critical pore size (CPZ), at which the adsorption capacity and uptake kinetic are significantly enhanced synchronously. The CPZs of BSA and gamma-globulin were identified to be 216.64 and 266.93 nm, respectively. Experimental results and analyses revealed that the high adsorption capacities at CPZ are attributed to the high utilization of binding sites in pores, and the uptake kinetics are enhanced by the combination of fast pore diffusion and chain delivery effect.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据