4.7 Article

MIL-68 (In) and ZIF-8 assisted construction of n-n heterostructure for the effective sensing of trace-level ozone

期刊

SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL
卷 380, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2023.133312

关键词

Metal organic frameworks (MOFs); O3; Gas sensor; Heterostructure; Metal oxide semiconductors

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work proposes the hybridization of MIL-68 (In) and ZIF-8 as dual metal organic frameworks sacrificial templates to design n-n heterostructures, which have been successfully utilized to develop metal oxide semiconductors with excellent gas sensing performance. The resulting sensor can detect ozone at concentrations as low as 15 ppb, attributed to the smart design of n-n heterostructure, rich active sites, and improved oxygen-adsorbing capacity.
The crucial challenge to exploit effective ozone (O3) gas sensors lies in developing novel functional sensing materials to meet the requirement of trace-level detection threshold (50 ppb). Metal oxide semiconductors (MOSs) with controllable heterogenous composites as high-performance sensing layers are expected to break through this bottleneck. This work proposes the hybridization of MIL-68 (In) and ZIF-8, which are employed as dual metal organic frameworks (MOFs) sacrificial templates to design n-n heterostructures. The derived In2O3 backbone showed a hexagonal prismatic structure with a large aspect ratio. The robust architecture enabled the uniform decoration of mass of ZnO nanoparticles (NPs) on the surfaces without the damage of high porosity for the gas diffusion. Consequently, the optimal sensor with appropriate ZnO NPs loading amount exhibited trace O3 detection ability as low as 15 ppb, which was attributed to the smart design of n-n heterostructure, rich active sites and improved oxygen-adsorbing capacity. Thus, this work inspires a new way to utilize the versatile dual MOFs template for constructing heterogenous composites as O3 sensing materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据