4.6 Article

Performance Analysis of Real-Time GPS/Galileo Precise Point Positioning Integrated with Inertial Navigation System

期刊

SENSORS
卷 23, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s23052396

关键词

GPS; Galileo; PPP; INS integration; real time; uncombined bias correction; ambiguity resolution

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the performance of real-time GPS/Galileo zero-difference ionosphere-free (IF) precise point positioning (PPP) and inertial navigation system (INS) integration was investigated. The use of uncombined bias products, which were independent of PPP modeling on the user side, enabled carrier phase ambiguity resolution (AR). The results showed that in the train test, ambiguity-float PPP had similar performance with PPP/INS integration, and after AR, significant improvements were achieved. In the van tests, TCI achieved the highest accuracies and effectively eliminated solution re-convergence in PPP.
The integration of global navigation satellite system (GNSS) precise point positioning (PPP) and inertial navigation system (INS) is widely used in navigation for its robustness and resilience, especially in case of GNSS signal blockage. With GNSS modernization, a variety of PPP models have been developed and studied, which has also led to various PPP/INS integration methods. In this study, we investigated the performance of a real-time GPS/Galileo zero-difference ionosphere-free (IF) PPP/INS integration with the application of uncombined bias products. This uncombined bias correction was independent of PPP modeling on the user side and also enabled carrier phase ambiguity resolution (AR). CNES (Centre National d'Etudes Spatiales) real-time orbit, clock, and uncombined bias products were used. Six positioning modes were evaluated, including PPP, PPP/INS loosely coupled integration (LCI), PPP/INS tightly coupled integration (TCI), and three of these with uncombined bias correction through a train positioning test in an open sky environment and two van positioning tests at a complex road and city center. All of the tests used a tactical-grade inertial measurement unit (IMU). In the train test, we found that ambiguity-float PPP had almost identical performance with LCI and TCI, which reached an accuracy of 8.5, 5.7, and 4.9 cm in the north (N), east (E) and up (U) direction, respectively. After AR, significant improvements on the east error component were achieved, which were 47%, 40%, and 38% for PPP-AR, PPP-AR/INS LCI, and PPP-AR/INS TCI, respectively. In the van tests, frequent signal interruptions due to bridges, vegetation, and city canyons make the IF AR difficult. TCI achieved the highest accuracies, which were 32, 29, and 41 cm for the N/E/U component, respectively, and also effectively eliminated the solution re-convergence in PPP.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据