4.6 Article

Development of a Core Body Thermometer Applicable for High-Temperature Environment Based on the Zero-Heat-Flux Method

期刊

SENSORS
卷 23, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s23041970

关键词

core body temperature; zero-heat-flux method; hot environment solution; core body thermometer; Peltier module

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By introducing a Peltier element, the zero-heat-flux core body thermometer for hot environments was improved. The prototype probe designed in this study demonstrated accurate measurement of deep temperatures with minimal error, even in high ambient temperatures. The results from various experiments showed that the newly developed probe with a Peltier module can accurately measure core body temperature, providing valuable insights for heat stress and thermal comfort monitoring.
Monitoring core body temperature (CBT) allows observation of heat stress and thermal comfort in various environments. By introducing a Peltier element, we improved the zero-heat-flux core body thermometer for hot environments. In this study, we performed a theoretical analysis, designed a prototype probe, and evaluated its performance through simulator experiments with human subjects. The finite element analysis shows that our design can reduce the influence of external temperature variations by as much as 1%. In the simulator experiment, the prototype probe could measure deep temperatures within an error of less than 0.1 degrees C, regardless of outside temperature change. In the ergometer experiment with four subjects, the average difference between the prototype probe and a commercial zero-heat-flux probe was +0.1 degrees C, with a 95% LOA of -0.23 degrees C to +0.21 degrees C. In the dome sauna test, the results measured in six of the seven subjects exhibited the same trend as the reference temperature. These results show that the newly developed probe with the Peltier module can measure CBT accurately, even when the ambient temperature is higher than CBT up to 42 degrees C.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据