4.6 Article

A Portable Triboelectric Nanogenerator Based on Dehydrated Nopal Powder for Powering Electronic Devices

期刊

SENSORS
卷 23, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s23094195

关键词

dehydrated nopal powder; energy harvesting; green energy; triboelectric nanogenerator; vibrations

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Researchers have developed a portable triboelectric nanogenerator (NOP-TENG) based on dehydrated nopal powder, which can convert green energy into electrical energy. This nanogenerator can be used for Internet-of-Things devices and offers a more sustainable alternative to chemical batteries. It has a simple structure, easy manufacturing process, stable electric behavior, and cost-effective output performance.
Triboelectric nanogenerators (TENGs) based on organic materials can harvest green energy to convert it into electrical energy. These nanogenerators could be used for Internet-of-Things (IoT) devices, substituting solid-state chemical batteries that have toxic materials and limited-service time. Herein, we develop a portable triboelectric nanogenerator based on dehydrated nopal powder (NOP-TENG) as novel triboelectric material. In addition, this nanogenerator uses a polyimide film tape adhered to two copper-coated Bakelite plates. The NOP-TENG generates a power density of 2309.98 mu W center dot m(-2) with a load resistance of 76.89 M Omega by applying a hand force on its outer surface. Furthermore, the nanogenerator shows a power density of 556.72 mu W center dot m(-2) with a load resistance of 76.89 M Omega and under 4g acceleration at 15 Hz. The output voltage of the NOP-TENG depicts a stable output performance even after 27,000 operation cycles. This nanogenerator can light eighteen green commercial LEDs and power a digital calculator. The proposed NOP-TENG has a simple structure, easy manufacturing process, stable electric behavior, and cost-effective output performance. This portable nanogenerator may power electronic devices using different vibration energy sources.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据