4.6 Article

Development of a Knowledge Graph for Automatic Job Hazard Analysis: The Schema

期刊

SENSORS
卷 23, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s23083893

关键词

knowledge graph; ontology; ontology schema; job hazard analysis; safety management; implicit knowledge; explicit knowledge; METHONTOLOGY; construction safety; knowledge management

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This research created a new ontology, the Job Hazard Analysis Knowledge Graph (JHAKG), by analyzing actual JHA documents and interviewing JHA domain experts. The JHAKG can answer queries regarding hazards, external factors, level of risks, and appropriate control measures. It provides more complete and comprehensive JHA documents compared to those produced by an individual safety manager.
In the current practice, an essential element of safety management systems, Job Hazard Analysis (JHA), is performed manually, relying on the safety personnel's experiential knowledge and observations. This research was conducted to create a new ontology that comprehensively represents the JHA knowledge domain, including the implicit knowledge. Specifically, 115 actual JHA documents and interviews with 18 JHA domain experts were analyzed and used as the source of knowledge for creating a new JHA knowledge base, namely the Job Hazard Analysis Knowledge Graph (JHAKG). To ensure the quality of the developed ontology, a systematic approach to ontology development called METHONTOLOGY was used in this process. The case study performed for validation purposes demonstrates that a JHAKG can operate as a knowledge base that answers queries regarding hazards, external factors, level of risks, and appropriate control measures to mitigate risks. As the JHAKG is a database of knowledge representing a large number of actual JHA cases previously developed and also implicit knowledge that has not been formalized in any explicit forms yet, the quality of JHA documents produced from queries to the database is expectedly higher than the ones produced by an individual safety manager in terms of completeness and comprehensiveness.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据