4.6 Review

Molecular evolution of the Thrombospondin superfamily

期刊

SEMINARS IN CELL & DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY
卷 155, 期 -, 页码 12-21

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2023.05.004

关键词

Cnidaria; Drosophila; Extracellular matrix; Myotendinous junction; Phylogeny; Porifera; Prawns; Tissue regeneration

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Thrombospondins (TSPs) play diverse roles in animals and have been found to belong to a superfamily that includes different subgroups such as mega-TSPs, sushi-TSPs, and poriferan-TSPs. Invertebrates encode a greater diversity of TSP superfamily members than vertebrates.
Thrombospondins (TSPs) are multidomain, calcium-binding glycoproteins that have wide-ranging roles in ver-tebrates in cell interactions, extracellular matrix (ECM) organisation, angiogenesis, tissue remodelling, syn-aptogenesis, and also in musculoskeletal and cardiovascular functions. Land animals encode five TSPs, which assembly co-translationally either as trimers (subgroup A) or pentamers (subgroup B). The vast majority of research has focused on this canonical TSP family, which evolved through the whole-genome duplications that took place early in the vertebrate lineage. With benefit of the growth in genome-and transcriptome-predicted proteomes of a much wider range of animal species, examination of TSPs throughout metazoan phyla has revealed extensive conservation of subgroup B-type TSPs in invertebrates. In addition, these searches established that canonical TSPs are, in fact, one branch within a TSP superfamily that includes other clades designated mega-TSPs, sushi-TSPs and poriferan-TSPs. Despite the apparent simplicity of poriferans and cnidarians as organisms, these phyla encode a greater diversity of TSP superfamily members than vertebrates. We discuss here the mo-lecular characteristics of the TSP superfamily members, current knowledge of their expression profiles and functions in invertebrates, and models for the evolution of this complex ECM superfamily.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据