4.7 Article

Effect of natural soil nanocolloids on the fate and toxicity of cadmium to rice (Oryza sativa L.) roots

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 879, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162887

关键词

Toxic heavy metal; Natural nanocolloids; Environmental behavior; Health risk; Rice(Oryza sativa L; )

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The interaction between natural nanocolloids (Ncs) in soil and cadmium (Cd) was investigated. Cd was found to bind to soil Ncs surface through hydrophilic effects and pi - pi interactions. Coexposure of soil Ncs and Cd significantly affected the phytotoxicity of Cd to rice roots, and downregulated metabolic pathways contributed to this adverse effect.
Toxic heavy metals are common contaminants and will most likely interact with ubiquitous natural nanocolloids (Ncs) in the soil environment. However, the effect of soil Ncs on the fate and health risk of cadmium (Cd) have not been well addressed. Here, the interaction between Ncs and Cd is investigated using two-dimensional correlation spectroscopy (2DCOS) combined with synchronous fluorescence and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Our results reveal that Cd binding to the soil Ncs surface is mainly driven through strong hydrophilic effects and pi - pi interactions, which contribute to a high adsorption capacity (366-612 mg/g) and strong affinity (KL = 4.3-9.7 L/mg) of Cd to soil Ncs. Interestingly, soil Ncs and Cd coexposure can significantly mediate the phytotoxicity (e.g., uptake, root growth, and oxidative stress) of Cd to rice (Oryza sativa L.) roots after 7 days of exposure. At the molecular level, metabolomic analysis reveals that the downregulated metabolic pathways (e.g., isoquinoline alkaloid and aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesis, glycine, serine and threonine metabolism) may contribute to the above adverse phyto-toxicity. This study provides new insight into the effect of natural Ncs on the fate and health risks of toxic heavy metals in soil environments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据