To burn or not to burn: An empirical assessment of the impacts of wildfires and prescribed fires on trace element concentrations in Western US streams

The use of low-severity prescribed fires has been increasingly promoted to reduce the impacts from high-severity wildfires and maintain ecosystem resilience. However, the effects of prescribed fires on water quality have rarely been evaluated relative to the effects of wildfires. In this study, we assessed the effects of 54 wildfires and 11 prescribed fires on trace element (arsenic, selenium, and cadmium) concentrations of streams draining burned watersheds in the western US. To obtain results independent of the choice of method, we employed three independent analytical approaches to evaluate fire effects on water quality for the first three post-fire years. In general, we observed significant increases in trace element concentrations in streams burned by large, high-severity wildfires, despite substantial variability across sites. Comparatively, we did not observe increases in the spring mean concentration of arsenic, selenium, and cadmium in watersheds burned by prescribed fires. Our analysis indicated that the post-fire trace element response in streams was primarily influenced by burn area, burn severity, post-fire weather, surface lithology, watershed physiography, and land cover. This study's results demonstrate that prescribed burns could lessen the post-fire trace element loads in downstream waters if prescribed fires reduce subsequent high severity fires in the landscape.

Automated summary

This study assessed the impact of both wildfires and prescribed fires on trace element concentrations in streams in the western US. The results showed that high-severity wildfires caused significant increases in trace element concentrations, while prescribed fires did not.