4.7 Article

Kinetic model of PFAS removal by semi-batch foam fractionation and validation by experimental data for K-PFOS

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 865, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.161145

关键词

Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS); Air-water interface; Adsorptive bubble separation; Foam fractionation; Electrolyte; Ionic strength

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Adsorptive bubble separation techniques, such as foam fractionation, are being used to extract per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) from water. However, there is a lack of mathematical models for their removal. This study presents a theoretical framework for the kinetics of PFAS removal using a semi-batch foam fractionation process, considering factors such as adsorption, entrainment, and volatilization. The proposed models provide quantitative tools for process design and optimization of PFAS removal.
Adsorptive bubble separation techniques such as foam fractionation have recently been applied for the extraction of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) from waters at both laboratory and operational scales. However, few authors have developed mathematical models of their removal of PFAS. This study presents a theoretical framework for the kinetics of PFAS removal from fresh and monovalent saline waters by a semi-batch foam fractionation process, by the mechanisms of adsorption, entrainment and volatilization, as a function of pertinent parameters including PFAS air-water adsorption, bubble radius, electrolyte concentration and ionic strength, PFAS volatility, and flow and geometric parameters. The freshwater model is validated for the removal of potassium perfluorooctane sulfonate (K-PFOS) using published experimental data (Meng, P. et al., Chemosphere, 2018, 203, 263-270). The proposed models provide quantitative tools for process design and the optimization of individual PFAS removal by semi-batch adsorptive bubble separation techniques such as foam fractionation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据