4.7 Article

EU need to protect its environment from toxic per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 876, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162770

关键词

PFAS; EU; Biomonitoring; Groundwater parks; Biomagnification; Policy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The EPAs of Denmark, Sweden, Norway, Germany, and the Netherlands have proposed a ban on the use of toxic industrial chemicals PFAS due to their harmful effects on human health and biodiversity. Denmark, the first EU country to ban PFAS, plans to establish groundwater parks to protect drinking water. They also call on the EU to list more toxic substances on the Stockholm Convention.
The Environmental Protection Agencies (EPAs) of Denmark, Sweden, Norway, Germany and the Netherlands submit-ted a proposal to the European Chemical Agency (ECHA) in February 2023 calling for a ban in the use of toxic indus-trial chemicals per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). These chemicals are highly toxic causing elevated cholesterol, immune suppression, reproductive failure, cancer and neuro-endocrine disruption in humans and wildlife being a significant threat to biodiversity and human health. The main reason for the submitted proposal is recent find-ings of significant flaws in the transition to PFAS replacements that is leading to a widespread pollution. Denmark was the first country banning PFAS, and now other EU countries support the restrictions of these carcinogenic, endocrine disruptive and immunotoxic chemicals. The proposed plan is among the most extensive received by the ECHA for 50 years. Denmark is now the first EU country to initiate the establishment of groundwater parks to try and protect its drinking water. These parks are areas free of agricultural activities and nutritious sewage sludge to secure drinking water free of xenobiotic including PFAS. The PFAS pollution also reflects the lack of comprehensive spatial and tem-poral environmental monitoring programs in the EU. Such monitoring programs should include key indicator species across ecosystems of livestock, fish and wildlife, to facilitate detection of early ecological warning signals and sustain public health. Simultaneously with inferring a total PFAS ban, the EU should also push for more persistent, bioaccumulative and toxic (PBT) PFAS substances to be listed on the Stockholm Convention (SC) Annex A such as PFOS (perfluorooctane sulfonic acid) that is currently listed on the SCs Annex B. The combination of these regulative restrictions combined with groundwater parks and pan-European biomonitoring programs, would pave the way for-ward for a cleaner environment to sustain health across the EU.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据