4.7 Article

Exploration of occurrence and sources of microplastics (>10 μm) in Danish marine waters

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 865, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.161255

关键词

Microplastics; MP abundance; Mass concentration; FTIR-imaging; Microplastic sources

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Microplastics (MPs) in Danish marine waters were found to be most abundant in the Copenhagen-Malmo area, suggesting that urban waste- and stormwater discharges may be significant sources of MPs in these waters.
Microplastics (MPs) were quantified in Danish marine waters of the Kattegat and the southernmost part of Skagerrak bordering to it. Kattegat is a waterbody between Denmark and Sweden that receives inflow from the Baltic Sea and direct urban runoff from the metropolitan area of Copenhagen and Malmo. MPs were measured in 14 continuous transects while steaming between monitoring stations. MP levels tended to be highest close to the Copenhagen-Malmo area, albeit this was more obvious from the abundance of particles rather than mass. The outcome of the measurements allowed a rough MP budget in the Danish Straits region, suggesting that urban waste- and stormwater discharges could not be neglected as potential MP source in these waters. The marine samples were collected by pumping and filtering water over 10 mu m steel filters, hereby sampling a total of 19.3 m3. They were prepared and analyzed by FPA-mu FTIR imaging, and the scans interpreted to yield MP size, shape, polymer type, and estimated mass. The average concentration was 103 +/- 86 items m-3, corresponding to 23.3 +/- 28.3 mu g m-3 (17-286 items m-3; 0.6-84.1 mu g m-3). Most MPs were smaller than 100 mu m and fragments dominated the samples. The carbonyl index was assessed for polyolefins, showing that oxidation increased with decreasing MP size, but did not correlate with distance to urban areas. A rough budget of MP in the Danish Straits region suggested that MPs discharged from urban waste- and stormwaters were an import source of MPs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据