The challenge of reducing macroplastic pollution: Testing the effectiveness of a river boom under real environmental conditions

Improving collection technologies is crucial to develop effective and economically feasible solutions for catching plastic from riverine environments. However, floating booms are being constructed and deployed in river around the world without rigorously testing its effectiveness. In this study, we tested the effectiveness of a boom under realistic conditions for several configurations and treatments (including C-shape and Slash-shape configurations). For this, we used the same macroplastics that leak out of waste management channels in order to be as realistic as possible. In total we used 52 plastic articles of 13 different polymers. The global effectiveness of the tested C-shape boom was lower than expected under such conditions (around 37 % of retention). The effectiveness of the Slash-shape boom was considerably worst (<10 %). However, the effectiveness varies greatly according to the particular characteristics of the plastic articles (i.e., shape and polymer composition), ranged from 0 to 100 %. For example, the boom could be 100 % effective retaining plastics such as Stylofoam trays and cups, 40-20 % for food-wrappers but 0 % for disposable plates and spoons, straws, monofilament fishing lines, packaging straps, hoses, pipes, elastic bands, etc. It seems that to have a reasonable catch-effectiveness and be cost-efficient, boom designs need to be improved and tested under different environmental conditions before to reach the market. In addition, it is unrealistic to select only high buoyancy plastics for testing them.

Automated summary

Improving collection technologies is crucial for developing effective and economically feasible solutions for plastic removal from rivers. However, the effectiveness of floating booms, which are being deployed worldwide, is not rigorously tested. This study tested the effectiveness of a boom under realistic conditions and found that both C-shape and Slash-shape configurations had lower than expected retention rates. The effectiveness varied greatly depending on the characteristics of the plastic articles, indicating the need for improved boom designs and testing under different environmental conditions before market release.