4.7 Article

Responses of soil seed banks to drought on a global scale

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 864, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.161142

关键词

Soil seed banks; Seed density; Seed richness; Drought; Meta-analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The global increase in drought frequency and intensity has potentially important effects on soil seed banks. This study evaluated the effects of drought on soil seed banks and identified key drivers. The results showed weak negative effects of drought on soil seed density and positive effects on soil seed richness.
The global increase in drought frequency and intensity in large areas has potentially important effects on soil seed banks (SSBs). However, a systematic evaluation of the impact of drought on SSBs at a global scale has not yet been well understood. We evaluated the effects of drought on SSBs and identified the association key drivers in the current meta-analysis. The overall effects of drought on soil seed density and richness were weak negative and positive, respec-tively. Drought significantly increased soil seed density by 11.94 % in forest ecosystem, whereas soil seed richness were significantly increased in vascular plants (7.39 %). Linear mixed-effect results showed that soil seed density and richness significantly reduced as increasing drought intensity. In addition, geography (altitude) has significance in controlling the lnRR of soil seed density by altering climate (mean annual precipitation, drought) and soil properties (pH, soil organic carbon, and clay content) in the structural equation model, whereas soil seed richness was controlled by geography (altitude, and latitude) via climate (mean annual precipitation). In summary, the results suggested the size of SSBs response to drought and its relationship with drought intensity in terrestrial ecosystems, it may shed light on ecosystem restoration, succession, and management using SSBs when estimating the future drought.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据