4.7 Article

Developmental regulation of conserved non-coding element evolution provides insights into limb loss in squamates

期刊

SCIENCE CHINA-LIFE SCIENCES
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s11427-023-2362-5

关键词

squamates; limb loss; cis-regulatory elements; early limb development

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Based on the analysis of three de novo-assembled genomes of limbless lizards from different lineages, this study demonstrates the crucial role of divergence of conserved non-coding elements (CNEs) in limb development. It is found that these CNEs are associated with genes essential for limb initiation and outgrowth as well as regulatory signals in the early stage of limb development. Moreover, the study highlights the significance of insertions and deletions (InDels) in the CNEs, which are lineage-specific in limbless squamates and affect the regulatory function of the CNEs.
Limb loss shows recurrent phenotypic evolution across squamate lineages. Here, based on three de novo-assembled genomes of limbless lizards from different lineages, we showed that divergence of conserved non-coding elements (CNEs) played an important role in limb development. These CNEs were associated with genes required for limb initiation and outgrowth, and with regulatory signals in the early stage of limb development. Importantly, we identified the extensive existence of insertions and deletions (InDels) in the CNEs, with the numbers ranging from 111 to 756. Most of these CNEs with InDels were lineage-specific in the limbless squamates. Nearby genes of these InDel CNEs were important to early limb formation, such as Tbx4, Fgf10, and Gli3. Based on functional experiments, we found that nucleotide mutations and InDels both affected the regulatory function of the CNEs. Our study provides molecular evidence underlying limb loss in squamate reptiles from a developmental perspective and sheds light on the importance of regulatory element InDels in phenotypic evolution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据