4.6 Article

NAND-SPIN-based processing-in-MRAM architecture for convolutional neural network acceleration

期刊

SCIENCE CHINA-INFORMATION SCIENCES
卷 66, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s11432-021-3472-9

关键词

processing-in-memory; convolutional neural network; NAND-like spintronics memory; nonvolatile memory; magnetic tunnel junction

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To address the performance and efficiency issues of running large-scale datasets on traditional computing systems, a NAND-SPIN-based PIM architecture is proposed for efficient convolutional neural network (CNN) acceleration. A straightforward data mapping scheme is employed to improve parallelism and reduce data movements. Experimental results demonstrate that the approach achieves similar to 2.6x speedup and similar to 1.4x improvement in energy efficiency compared to state-of-the-art PIM solutions.
The performance and efficiency of running large-scale datasets on traditional computing systems exhibit critical bottlenecks due to the existing power wall and memory wall problems. To resolve those problems, processing-in-memory (PIM) architectures are developed to bring computation logic in or near memory to alleviate the bandwidth limitations during data transmission. NAND-like spintronics memory (NAND-SPIN) is one kind of promising magnetoresistive random-access memory (MRAM) with low write energy and high integration density, and it can be employed to perform efficient in-memory computation operations. In this study, we propose a NAND-SPIN-based PIM architecture for efficient convolutional neural network (CNN) acceleration. A straightforward data mapping scheme is exploited to improve parallelism while reducing data movements. Benefiting from the excellent characteristics of NAND-SPIN and in-memory processing architecture, experimental results show that the proposed approach can achieve similar to 2.6x speedup and similar to 1.4x improvement in energy efficiency over state-of-the-art PIM solutions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据