Clinical outcomes of clip-assisted endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection versus conventional endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection in treating gastric varices with a gastrorenal shunt

Background and study aimsThe optimal treatment for gastric varices (GVs) is a topic that remains definite for this study. This study compared the clinical outcomes of clip-assisted endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection (clip-ECI) to conventional endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection (con-ECI) for the treatment of GVs with a gastrorenal shunt.Patients and methodsData were collected retrospectively in five medical centers from 2015 to 2020. The patients were treated with con-ECI (n = 126) or clip-ECI (n = 148). Clinical characteristics and procedural outcomes were compared. Patients were followed until death, liver transplantation or 6 months after the treatment. The primary outcome was rebleeding, and the secondary outcome was survival.ResultsThere were no significant differences in age, sex, etiology, shunt diameter and Child-Pugh classification between the two groups. Fewer GVs obliteration sessions were required in the clip-ECI group than in the con-ECI group (p = 0.015). The cumulative 6-month rebleeding-free rates were 88.6% in the clip-ECI group and 73.7% in the con-ECI group (p = 0.002). The cumulative 6-month survival rates were 97.1% in the clip-ECI group and 94.8% in the con-ECI group (p = 0.378).ConclusionsCompared with con-ECI, clip-ECI appears more effective for the treatment of GVs with a gastrorenal shunt, which required less sessions and achieved a higher 6-month rebleeding-free rate.

Automated summary

This study compared the clinical outcomes of clip-assisted endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection (clip-ECI) to conventional endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection (con-ECI) for the treatment of gastric varices (GVs) with a gastrorenal shunt. The results showed that clip-ECI was more effective than con-ECI, requiring fewer treatment sessions and achieving a lower 6-month rebleeding rate.