4.7 Review

Review on robot-assisted polishing: Status and future trends

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rcim.2022.102482

关键词

Polishing; Robot-assisted polishing; Force control; Error compensation; Ultra-precision machining

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nowadays, precision components are widely used in various industries. To achieve nanometric surface roughness, high-precision polishing is necessary. Robot-assisted polishing, with its advantages of flexible working ranges and low cost, has become more widely used in demanding tasks. However, there is a lack of review articles on the development of robot-assisted polishing. This paper reviews the recent progress in this field, covering the integration of robots with polishing techniques, constant force control, error analysis, compensation methods, and future trends.
Nowadays, precision components have been extensively used in various industries such as biomedicine, pho-tonics, and optics. To achieve nanometric surface roughness, high-precision polishing is mandatory. Compared with the conventional polishing techniques, the robot-assisted polishing has the advantages of flexible working ranges and low cost. Therefore, it has been more widely deployed in demanding polishing tasks. However, few review articles were found on this topic to provide a general progress on the development of the robot-assisted polishing technology. This paper reviews the recent advancement of the robot-assisted polishing. Firstly, the integration of robots with various polishing techniques is overviewed, followed by the introduction of the research status of constant force control in robot-assisted polishing. Then, the errors in typical robot-assisted polishing systems are analyzed, together with the corresponding compensation methods. At last, the future trends in the development of robot-assisted polishing are discussed. This review is intended as a roadmap for researchers or engineers who are interested in robot-assisted polishing or machining.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据