4.5 Article

Demonstration of improved laser preheat with a cryogenically cooled magnetized liner inertial fusion platform

期刊

REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS
卷 94, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0142587

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present the progress made in implementing and testing cryogenically cooled platforms for MagLIF experiments. Two platforms were developed, one integrated on the Z pulsed power generator and one laser-only platform. The experiments showed that cooled targets achieved significantly higher energy coupling compared to warm experiments, with around 89% +/- 10% of incident energy coupled to the fuel. The integrated experiment, z3576, achieved the highest preheat energy coupling to date, demonstrating excellent temperature control and current delivery.
We report on progress implementing and testing cryogenically cooled platforms for Magnetized Liner Inertial Fusion (MagLIF) experiments. Two cryogenically cooled experimental platforms were developed: an integrated platform fielded on the Z pulsed power generator that combines magnetization, laser preheat, and pulsed-power-driven fuel compression and a laser-only platform in a separate chamber that enables measurements of the laser preheat energy using shadowgraphy measurements. The laser-only experiments suggest that similar to 89% +/- 10% of the incident energy is coupled to the fuel in cooled targets across the energy range tested, significantly higher than previous warm experiments that achieved at most 67% coupling and in line with simulation predictions. The laser preheat configuration was applied to a cryogenically cooled integrated experiment that used a novel cryostat configuration that cooled the MagLIF liner from both ends. The integrated experiment, z3576, coupled 2.32 +/- 0.25 kJ preheat energy to the fuel, the highest to-date, demonstrated excellent temperature control and nominal current delivery, and produced one of the highest pressure stagnations as determined by a Bayesian analysis of the data.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据