4.2 Article

Understanding COPD Etiology, Pathophysiology, and Definition

期刊

RESPIRATORY CARE
卷 68, 期 7, 页码 859-870

出版社

DAEDALUS ENTERPRISES INC
DOI: 10.4187/respcare.10873

关键词

COPD; pathophysiology; small airways disease; nosology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

COPD, a major global health problem, lacks effective disease-modifying therapies for most patients due to the heterogeneity of phenotypes. Progress has been made in understanding specific pathological processes and developing personalized therapies. However, there is a need to expand diagnostic criteria for COPD to include more individuals with similar disease manifestations.
COPD, one of the leading worldwide health problems, currently lacks truly disease-modifying medical therapies applicable to most patients. Developing such novel therapies has been hampered by the marked heterogeneity of phenotypes between individuals with COPD. Such heterogeneity suggests that, rather than a single cause (particularly just direct inhalation of tobacco products), development and progression of COPD likely involve both complex gene-by-environment interactions to multiple inhalational exposures and a variety of molecular pathways. However, there has been considerable recent progress toward understanding how specific pathological processes can lead to discrete COPD phenotypes, particularly that of small airways disease. Advances in imaging techniques that correlate to specific types of histological damage, and in the immunological mechanisms of lung damage in COPD, hold promise for development of personalized therapies. At the same time, there is growing recognition that the current diagnostic criteria for COPD, based solely on spirometry, exclude large numbers of individuals with very similar disease manifestations. This concise review summarizes current understanding of the etiology and pathophysiology of COPD and provides background explaining the increasing calls to expand the diagnostic criteria used to diagnose COPD and some challenges in doing so.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据